Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
Audio Visual Technology
Which TV to buy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KenMasters" data-source="post: 296729" data-attributes="member: 517"><p>If you're using "screen fit", there's no overscan, and with no overscan there's no room for pixel orbiting. So while it's perfect for watching Blu-rays and such, offering full resolution, it's not good to use with static images for long periods.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For a couple of reasons. Picture quality is great for the price and plasma generally has an advantage over LCD for fast moving action (as in sports). Comparing the Panasonic to the Samsung, both are good entry level plasmas, but if you plan on watching a lot of TV, recent Panasonics don't display 50Hz material as well as Samsungs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not because he's using a plasma, that's because he's using the wrong aspect ratio. It's an option sometimes called "Just" that was created to make 4:3 content look less stretched on a 16:9 TV. It attempts to keep things in the center of the image proportional but warps the edges to do so, creating that fish bowl effect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KenMasters, post: 296729, member: 517"] If you're using "screen fit", there's no overscan, and with no overscan there's no room for pixel orbiting. So while it's perfect for watching Blu-rays and such, offering full resolution, it's not good to use with static images for long periods. For a couple of reasons. Picture quality is great for the price and plasma generally has an advantage over LCD for fast moving action (as in sports). Comparing the Panasonic to the Samsung, both are good entry level plasmas, but if you plan on watching a lot of TV, recent Panasonics don't display 50Hz material as well as Samsungs. That's not because he's using a plasma, that's because he's using the wrong aspect ratio. It's an option sometimes called "Just" that was created to make 4:3 content look less stretched on a 16:9 TV. It attempts to keep things in the center of the image proportional but warps the edges to do so, creating that fish bowl effect. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
Audio Visual Technology
Which TV to buy
Top