Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Where is the weakest link when things get big?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ludo" data-source="post: 97386" data-attributes="member: 691"><p>It's like an Eros/Thanatos or even a Lucifer/Ahriman thing. Shucks, I'm just making it worse now...</p><p></p><p>For the purpose of discussion I may point out that all members of this forum are perfect ladies/gentlemen as the case may be, and certainly beyond reproach. And that ludo only ponders these things philosophically from afar, of course. What matters is accuracy. Laying a finger on accuracy is pretty difficult though. Yes Alphabet, I almost said it's hard. (And about the finger, no Alphabet, not that way, not at all, and getting closer does not let one see more, no.)</p><p></p><p>Not to worry Ian. If we just had our ideas and didn't try to get them across, it would be easier but we'd also be a lot more stupid. All this beating around the bush (AAARGH!) is just an attampt to hint (technically) at where accuracy was lost and the rose-coloured glasses had to come out. An' those be PINK, innit? Ohfergoodnessake. </p><p></p><p>But I don't really know <em>how it works</em>, or most other things either. I find that extremely infuriating.</p><p></p><p>Sorry Alternativeroute, I'll try to think of something actually useful to add to the discussion. It is close to my heart you see. These dynamics ;D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ludo, post: 97386, member: 691"] It's like an Eros/Thanatos or even a Lucifer/Ahriman thing. Shucks, I'm just making it worse now... For the purpose of discussion I may point out that all members of this forum are perfect ladies/gentlemen as the case may be, and certainly beyond reproach. And that ludo only ponders these things philosophically from afar, of course. What matters is accuracy. Laying a finger on accuracy is pretty difficult though. Yes Alphabet, I almost said it's hard. (And about the finger, no Alphabet, not that way, not at all, and getting closer does not let one see more, no.) Not to worry Ian. If we just had our ideas and didn't try to get them across, it would be easier but we'd also be a lot more stupid. All this beating around the bush (AAARGH!) is just an attampt to hint (technically) at where accuracy was lost and the rose-coloured glasses had to come out. An' those be PINK, innit? Ohfergoodnessake. But I don't really know [i]how it works[/i], or most other things either. I find that extremely infuriating. Sorry Alternativeroute, I'll try to think of something actually useful to add to the discussion. It is close to my heart you see. These dynamics ;D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Where is the weakest link when things get big?
Top