Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
Vinyl
Three decks, three carts, three technologies.. which is which/ better?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 370315" data-attributes="member: 14394"><p>Congrats!</p><p></p><p>I was surprised that the DL-160/RB300 combination would have more bass than the Grado combination. Must then be that the Garrard imposing that signature, as I got used to the RB300, and that arm definitely had never sounded bass heavy. Dynamic, yes. So, I guess I prefer the Grado then. :roll:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 370315, member: 14394"] Congrats! I was surprised that the DL-160/RB300 combination would have more bass than the Grado combination. Must then be that the Garrard imposing that signature, as I got used to the RB300, and that arm definitely had never sounded bass heavy. Dynamic, yes. So, I guess I prefer the Grado then. :roll: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
Vinyl
Three decks, three carts, three technologies.. which is which/ better?
Top