Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
The "You suck AVSA, thread" ;-)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joel" data-source="post: 83685" data-attributes="member: 406"><p>If the reviews have become predictable, can anyone propose a structure that would work?</p><p></p><p>And yes there has to be some structure to all reviews. </p><p></p><p>I like to mention</p><p>some (but not all) features.</p><p>ease of installation and set up. This is important to newbies.</p><p>Performance: under real world conditions</p><p>Value based on performance/buck.</p><p></p><p>I get irritated if I have to read the manual to learn how to do some basic function.</p><p>In my opinion it's no use having some performance enhancing feature if its too confusing for Mr or Mrs average to use. (one of the reasons some complex gear get less then sterling reviews)</p><p></p><p>Ap testing is easy to do if you have the equipment for long enough.</p><p>We investigated this a while ago with UCT.</p><p></p><p> </p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joel, post: 83685, member: 406"] If the reviews have become predictable, can anyone propose a structure that would work? And yes there has to be some structure to all reviews. I like to mention some (but not all) features. ease of installation and set up. This is important to newbies. Performance: under real world conditions Value based on performance/buck. I get irritated if I have to read the manual to learn how to do some basic function. In my opinion it's no use having some performance enhancing feature if its too confusing for Mr or Mrs average to use. (one of the reasons some complex gear get less then sterling reviews) Ap testing is easy to do if you have the equipment for long enough. We investigated this a while ago with UCT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
The "You suck AVSA, thread" ;-)
Top