Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
SVS Subwoofers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vaughan" data-source="post: 81229" data-attributes="member: 693"><p>Nosnipelimit, I would expect the Fathom to perform worse in output and THD. The sub can't defy the laws of physics. The SVS is a much bigger cabinet and it is ported. Comparing THD figures between subwoofers will not tell you in any way how that subwoofer will sound. SVS subwoofers are fantastic performers for home theater. In fact, probably world-class performers for HT, especially within it's price. However, I would think about buying Mark Seatons Submersive over a PB13-Ultra any day of the week.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vaughan, post: 81229, member: 693"] Nosnipelimit, I would expect the Fathom to perform worse in output and THD. The sub can't defy the laws of physics. The SVS is a much bigger cabinet and it is ported. Comparing THD figures between subwoofers will not tell you in any way how that subwoofer will sound. SVS subwoofers are fantastic performers for home theater. In fact, probably world-class performers for HT, especially within it's price. However, I would think about buying Mark Seatons Submersive over a PB13-Ultra any day of the week. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
SVS Subwoofers
Top