Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
So, it was decided...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Family_Dog" data-source="post: 61454" data-attributes="member: 82"><p>Shaun, this is precisely the reason I used RG59 over RG58! It seemed more flexible in spite of the solid centre conductor, compared to RG58 which has a stranded core. But the sheathing of the RG59 I use seems to lend itself nicely to following curves etc where I need them.</p><p></p><p>We use RG58 at work professionally, Mil-Spec type, but I had to buy out the RG59 especially, also Mil-Spec.</p><p></p><p></p><p>-F_D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Family_Dog, post: 61454, member: 82"] Shaun, this is precisely the reason I used RG59 over RG58! It seemed more flexible in spite of the solid centre conductor, compared to RG58 which has a stranded core. But the sheathing of the RG59 I use seems to lend itself nicely to following curves etc where I need them. We use RG58 at work professionally, Mil-Spec type, but I had to buy out the RG59 especially, also Mil-Spec. -F_D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
So, it was decided...
Top