Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Members' Kit pics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vince MacMahon" data-source="post: 1025006" data-attributes="member: 17633"><p>Those metal tweeters will pierce your ear if paired with amps that pronounce the brightness. </p><p></p><p>I have had a similar experience too hence my amp choice....that rolls off highs a bit earlier than usual and also on the ?warmth side? of things. </p><p></p><p>The Anniversaries I have, though not fully broken in, are best bang for buck given the performance. Lovely full sound. The continuum material does have a better flare for mid-range. Sounds more neutral than the original 685s </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vince MacMahon, post: 1025006, member: 17633"] Those metal tweeters will pierce your ear if paired with amps that pronounce the brightness. I have had a similar experience too hence my amp choice....that rolls off highs a bit earlier than usual and also on the ?warmth side? of things. The Anniversaries I have, though not fully broken in, are best bang for buck given the performance. Lovely full sound. The continuum material does have a better flare for mid-range. Sounds more neutral than the original 685s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Members' Kit pics
Top