Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
DIY & Tutorials
DIY For Audio
Isotherm vs Think Pink
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnc" data-source="post: 85851" data-attributes="member: 2084"><p>That is why I don't understand why one would want dense material.</p><p>I agree with Shonver:</p><p></p><p>Of course, for this to happen it should be placed where there is air flow. This is often overlooked.</p><p>Even very sparse stuff works well where there is a lot of air flow (like in a port).</p><p></p><p>It would be nice to see some more votes, hint hint. :<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnc, post: 85851, member: 2084"] That is why I don't understand why one would want dense material. I agree with Shonver: Of course, for this to happen it should be placed where there is air flow. This is often overlooked. Even very sparse stuff works well where there is a lot of air flow (like in a port). It would be nice to see some more votes, hint hint. ::) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
DIY & Tutorials
DIY For Audio
Isotherm vs Think Pink
Top