Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
i am still Gobsmacked a week later...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blizzard" data-source="post: 996378" data-attributes="member: 17567"><p>Seeing that this thread is still running, and after reading it again in full, point for point, my verdict stays the same. Buyer is wrong by a mile.</p><p></p><p>Some points:</p><p>Buyer dealt with seller before and says he was not comfortable with the sale. Why deal with the seller again?</p><p>Why does the buyer think he deserves the privilege to review equipment at the seller's financial outlay and risk? This smacks of arrogance. Put the shoe on the other foot, pay for the item at the reduced cash price. Now the buyer carries the financial layout and risk. Simple. you don't like it, sell it on! Wonder why that option wasn't chosen :whistler: ( But the seller is expected to do this) :ticked:</p><p>I have many more points I could mention here ,but at the risk of it getting personal, I will not go there.</p><p>In conclusion to the buyer. Sorry Mate , Bud , Boet, Meneer, Mevrou, you are way off the mark here and wrong for your expectations , and washing that laundry here on the forum!</p><p>My last :2c: worth.</p><p>Over and out </p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blizzard, post: 996378, member: 17567"] Seeing that this thread is still running, and after reading it again in full, point for point, my verdict stays the same. Buyer is wrong by a mile. Some points: Buyer dealt with seller before and says he was not comfortable with the sale. Why deal with the seller again? Why does the buyer think he deserves the privilege to review equipment at the seller's financial outlay and risk? This smacks of arrogance. Put the shoe on the other foot, pay for the item at the reduced cash price. Now the buyer carries the financial layout and risk. Simple. you don't like it, sell it on! Wonder why that option wasn't chosen :whistler: ( But the seller is expected to do this) :ticked: I have many more points I could mention here ,but at the risk of it getting personal, I will not go there. In conclusion to the buyer. Sorry Mate , Bud , Boet, Meneer, Mevrou, you are way off the mark here and wrong for your expectations , and washing that laundry here on the forum! My last :2c: worth. Over and out [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
i am still Gobsmacked a week later...
Top