Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
How bad is pro-amplifiers really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Karabo C" data-source="post: 34314" data-attributes="member: 365"><p>I've always wondered the same thing.</p><p></p><p>Many recordings, including ones that audiophiles treasure, are produced using pro-equipment. By ?pro? (and any other pro-equipment like headphones, cables, etc.) I'm referring to equipment used in studios by recording engineers and the like, not the junk sometimes used in discos or PA systems. If the equipment is good enough to produce these recording, what makes them inferior in reproducing the very same recordings in a home environment?</p><p></p><p>I'm aware that there are differences in design philosophy and application between pro and home-audio amplifier as indicated in the above posts, but are the two really worlds apart as we are led to believe?</p><p></p><p>I'm no electronic engineer or anything like that but I've always had suspicions that some competent pro-equipment is maligned in favour of comparable home audio products on the basis of image and perception.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Karabo C, post: 34314, member: 365"] I've always wondered the same thing. Many recordings, including ones that audiophiles treasure, are produced using pro-equipment. By ?pro? (and any other pro-equipment like headphones, cables, etc.) I'm referring to equipment used in studios by recording engineers and the like, not the junk sometimes used in discos or PA systems. If the equipment is good enough to produce these recording, what makes them inferior in reproducing the very same recordings in a home environment? I'm aware that there are differences in design philosophy and application between pro and home-audio amplifier as indicated in the above posts, but are the two really worlds apart as we are led to believe? I'm no electronic engineer or anything like that but I've always had suspicions that some competent pro-equipment is maligned in favour of comparable home audio products on the basis of image and perception. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
How bad is pro-amplifiers really?
Top