Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
GB on forum DAC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shonver" data-source="post: 18695" data-attributes="member: 34"><p>I would rather use better caps than more capacitance if it is a problem. However, better routing can also eliminate much of the problems that get "solved" by adding more capacitance. E.g., separate digital and analogue grounds, avoid creating current loops, use shortest trace between decoupling cap and digital device; if possible, supply decoupling caps from a star point. In practice the latter may not be possible, so most often designers use a copper flood, which is a bit better than merely parallelling feeds to the various devices.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shonver, post: 18695, member: 34"] I would rather use better caps than more capacitance if it is a problem. However, better routing can also eliminate much of the problems that get "solved" by adding more capacitance. E.g., separate digital and analogue grounds, avoid creating current loops, use shortest trace between decoupling cap and digital device; if possible, supply decoupling caps from a star point. In practice the latter may not be possible, so most often designers use a copper flood, which is a bit better than merely parallelling feeds to the various devices. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
GB on forum DAC
Top