Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
DIY & Tutorials
DIY For Audio
DIY centre
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hennie" data-source="post: 48533" data-attributes="member: 20"><p>Some horn fans to to extreme lengths to damp vibrations and here we have a very thin walled "horn" with its cone breakup right in the major part of the tweeter pass band. It surely must have an effect. Probably the reasons most co-axials use polypropylene which at least does have some damping.</p><p></p><p>On the plus side, the co-axial design eliminates horizontal lobing, from which all centre channels lying on their side suffer severely.</p><p></p><p>A case of pro's and con's.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hennie, post: 48533, member: 20"] Some horn fans to to extreme lengths to damp vibrations and here we have a very thin walled "horn" with its cone breakup right in the major part of the tweeter pass band. It surely must have an effect. Probably the reasons most co-axials use polypropylene which at least does have some damping. On the plus side, the co-axial design eliminates horizontal lobing, from which all centre channels lying on their side suffer severely. A case of pro's and con's. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
DIY & Tutorials
DIY For Audio
DIY centre
Top