Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Bi-wiring my JPW330's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DevillEars" data-source="post: 17148"><p>What you are, in effect, describing is the combination of two aspects/approaches:</p><p></p><p>1) Application of proven theory based on scientific & engineering practice</p><p>2) Modification/adjustment based on accumulated (and documented) experience</p><p></p><p>Approach 1) can only take you so far as it tends not to cater for the subjective human differences commonly referred to as "personal tastes"...</p><p>At this point, approach 2) comes into play...</p><p></p><p>Whether or not approach 2) has ceased to be empirical because the results achieved from empirical experimentation have been documented and just referred to as opposed to having to repeat the process, is something of a moot point... 8)</p><p></p><p>Which brings us to a philosophical question:</p><p></p><p>If, after multiple iterations of documented "tuning adjustments" we arrive at a point where we have a basis for targeted design, BUT we are still not able to explain why or how this "tuning" works, can we categorise this as "scientific"?</p><p></p><p> ;D ;D ;D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DevillEars, post: 17148"] What you are, in effect, describing is the combination of two aspects/approaches: 1) Application of proven theory based on scientific & engineering practice 2) Modification/adjustment based on accumulated (and documented) experience Approach 1) can only take you so far as it tends not to cater for the subjective human differences commonly referred to as "personal tastes"... At this point, approach 2) comes into play... Whether or not approach 2) has ceased to be empirical because the results achieved from empirical experimentation have been documented and just referred to as opposed to having to repeat the process, is something of a moot point... 8) Which brings us to a philosophical question: If, after multiple iterations of documented "tuning adjustments" we arrive at a point where we have a basis for targeted design, BUT we are still not able to explain why or how this "tuning" works, can we categorise this as "scientific"? ;D ;D ;D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Bi-wiring my JPW330's
Top