Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Audio discussions - friend over at your place?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Byrd2" data-source="post: 21432" data-attributes="member: 384"><p>That is not what we are talking about here. "Some resistors", a little vague. Mind being more specific? Circuits I have seen (in fact one I used), used a summing output for the two channels. IE the signal was running into a buffered sink. This would have no noticable effect. The other interesting thing i saw in looking at the other ML speakers is that they have line level rca inputs (which they specify as prefered). How does this fit in with your theories? Are they trying to get their customers to pick up radio alaska?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Erm hopefully it is shielded, you do i presume sell the stuff. What prevents speaker cables from becoming antanae?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Would the reverse also not be true as in the items already pointed out? I have tried the high level approach, with both an undertuned reflex as well as an undertuned sealed enclosure using Linkwitz-Riely Eq. It did work relatively well, although there was a slight bit more hum than on a non powered signal. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Here comes the sales pitch</p><p></p><p></p><p>Shew you also one of the club interested in how big other guys d*cks are? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would imagine that your clients would feel safe in the knowledge that, if nothing else, their supplier at least has a big ego <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>BTW, you still in Piet Hugo? </p><p></p><p>Peace out Frog</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Byrd2, post: 21432, member: 384"] That is not what we are talking about here. "Some resistors", a little vague. Mind being more specific? Circuits I have seen (in fact one I used), used a summing output for the two channels. IE the signal was running into a buffered sink. This would have no noticable effect. The other interesting thing i saw in looking at the other ML speakers is that they have line level rca inputs (which they specify as prefered). How does this fit in with your theories? Are they trying to get their customers to pick up radio alaska? Erm hopefully it is shielded, you do i presume sell the stuff. What prevents speaker cables from becoming antanae? Would the reverse also not be true as in the items already pointed out? I have tried the high level approach, with both an undertuned reflex as well as an undertuned sealed enclosure using Linkwitz-Riely Eq. It did work relatively well, although there was a slight bit more hum than on a non powered signal. Here comes the sales pitch Shew you also one of the club interested in how big other guys d*cks are? I would imagine that your clients would feel safe in the knowledge that, if nothing else, their supplier at least has a big ego :D BTW, you still in Piet Hugo? Peace out Frog [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Audio discussions - friend over at your place?
Top