Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Another Thor thread i think
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Norval" data-source="post: 8276" data-attributes="member: 62"><p>Byrd, You're quite right in both your observations, these drivers can do much better at the LF end. But bare in mind that coupling to your room will increase the LF gain dramatically. Anyway, thats besides the point since as I mentioned before I would also not use the original size line.</p><p></p><p>With regard to Fr response, I once again agree with the both of you, Shaun and Byrd. But as far as going MTM, it should also be considered that the hi mid are now produced by two drivers and not only one. At that fr the wavelength is less than 140mm. A path diff of only 70mm between the drivers would mean a cancellation at that fr point. Thus the listening hight of the tweeter now becomes extreamly critical.</p><p>With a MTM the distance between the two drivers can not be less than what the tweeter alows. And for better off axis response (vertical) I think a lower fr will work better. These tweeters are also quite capable of it I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Norval, post: 8276, member: 62"] Byrd, You're quite right in both your observations, these drivers can do much better at the LF end. But bare in mind that coupling to your room will increase the LF gain dramatically. Anyway, thats besides the point since as I mentioned before I would also not use the original size line. With regard to Fr response, I once again agree with the both of you, Shaun and Byrd. But as far as going MTM, it should also be considered that the hi mid are now produced by two drivers and not only one. At that fr the wavelength is less than 140mm. A path diff of only 70mm between the drivers would mean a cancellation at that fr point. Thus the listening hight of the tweeter now becomes extreamly critical. With a MTM the distance between the two drivers can not be less than what the tweeter alows. And for better off axis response (vertical) I think a lower fr will work better. These tweeters are also quite capable of it I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Another Thor thread i think
Top