Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Commercial Members
Commercial Members - News & Discussion
Air Loudpeakers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Air" data-source="post: 649740" data-attributes="member: 15182"><p>Timber_MG</p><p></p><p>Thanks for your comment.</p><p></p><p>My results are similar to what I have seen elsewhere on the web when the ring radiator is used. So I think you are probably correct. Besides, when I revisited previous designs done with the standard faceplate, the results were actually very acceptable with the 150mm mid. </p><p></p><p>However, I have changed the conical throat to an oblate spheroid design to see if the driver's response does not improve. I will keep the tractrix exit and increase the mouth to see what the effects are. The smaller irregularities on the photo that could impact on the diffraction is obviously because of the 3D printing method I use for the prototyping that will be not an issue in the final milled aluminium baffle. </p><p></p><p>The default option would be to use the profile of the standard faceplate, or a slight variation of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Air, post: 649740, member: 15182"] Timber_MG Thanks for your comment. My results are similar to what I have seen elsewhere on the web when the ring radiator is used. So I think you are probably correct. Besides, when I revisited previous designs done with the standard faceplate, the results were actually very acceptable with the 150mm mid. However, I have changed the conical throat to an oblate spheroid design to see if the driver's response does not improve. I will keep the tractrix exit and increase the mouth to see what the effects are. The smaller irregularities on the photo that could impact on the diffraction is obviously because of the 3D printing method I use for the prototyping that will be not an issue in the final milled aluminium baffle. The default option would be to use the profile of the standard faceplate, or a slight variation of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Commercial Members
Commercial Members - News & Discussion
Air Loudpeakers
Top