Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Using bi-wire as single-wire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ampdog" data-source="post: 35945" data-attributes="member: 144"><p>In reply:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Goneten,</p><p></p><p>OK. This has come through in an irritating way, so may I apologise to you; no offense was intended to you as person even though it could appear that way. Please note that I try to reply to the <em>content</em> of posts without regard to the writer; now and then the spirit in which goes astray.</p><p></p><p>My irritation was that I so often had to remind folks that effects shown was true, but not applicable to audio, more precisely what we can hear. I did read the Audioholics article; in fact it has been with me for some time now, as well as their other relevant contributions. This is also my interpretation of the relevant Audioholics post (hope <em>I</em> am now on the same page!), but I will react to that tomorrow with how I interpret it. I am in fact reacting with the owed apology only to this now as it is close to midnight, and I must still go make my supper!</p><p></p><p>Regards (and here's to you good health - at least, it will be after I have gone and poured a glass of wine in a minute!).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ampdog, post: 35945, member: 144"] In reply: Goneten, OK. This has come through in an irritating way, so may I apologise to you; no offense was intended to you as person even though it could appear that way. Please note that I try to reply to the [I]content[/I] of posts without regard to the writer; now and then the spirit in which goes astray. My irritation was that I so often had to remind folks that effects shown was true, but not applicable to audio, more precisely what we can hear. I did read the Audioholics article; in fact it has been with me for some time now, as well as their other relevant contributions. This is also my interpretation of the relevant Audioholics post (hope [I]I[/I] am now on the same page!), but I will react to that tomorrow with how I interpret it. I am in fact reacting with the owed apology only to this now as it is close to midnight, and I must still go make my supper! Regards (and here's to you good health - at least, it will be after I have gone and poured a glass of wine in a minute!). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Using bi-wire as single-wire
Top