Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Proac 2.5 clone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hennie" data-source="post: 29351" data-attributes="member: 20"><p>On second look - OK yes, the original tweeter was a D2010-8513 (19mm). The version with the D2905-9500 (25mm) is probably the one you can build today as the 19mm dome looks like it has been discontinued. It may well outperform the original as the 9500 is a solid performer. But the replacement tweeter could also tolerate a lower cross putting that midbass more into its comfort zone.</p><p></p><p>The midbass was praised by many for its performance in the bass region. I don't have experience with it but the 8545 (different Q, more suitable for bass reflex) was a stellar performer in the bass - and probably still is. OTOH the Usher equivalents are much cheaper and offer similar performance. I just don't know how many well sorted designs have been published.</p><p></p><p>Well, anyway, due to the different tweeter the design diverges quite a bit from the original ProAc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hennie, post: 29351, member: 20"] On second look - OK yes, the original tweeter was a D2010-8513 (19mm). The version with the D2905-9500 (25mm) is probably the one you can build today as the 19mm dome looks like it has been discontinued. It may well outperform the original as the 9500 is a solid performer. But the replacement tweeter could also tolerate a lower cross putting that midbass more into its comfort zone. The midbass was praised by many for its performance in the bass region. I don't have experience with it but the 8545 (different Q, more suitable for bass reflex) was a stellar performer in the bass - and probably still is. OTOH the Usher equivalents are much cheaper and offer similar performance. I just don't know how many well sorted designs have been published. Well, anyway, due to the different tweeter the design diverges quite a bit from the original ProAc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Proac 2.5 clone
Top