Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Means, Motive and Opportunity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ampdog" data-source="post: 15550" data-attributes="member: 144"><p>:-[ :'(</p><p></p><p>Again I seem not to have succeeded. <em>Certainly</em> not all, Robert. Perhaps typical yes, as I hope will, in all fairness, have been apparent from my recent posts as well as those of others. (See reply to AV.) This is the penalty of labelling. An impression of class distinction is generated, which is in fact why it is regrettably successful as an promotional tool. Man's vanity etc. That you cannot deny. If you felt I did that to you (as in personally), I apologise. After all, I simply do not know you well enough to commit such a generality. I will accept that you fall into the category of AV's views, if that is what you say.</p><p></p><p>I do recall using the phrase of "flat-earthers" - not sure in what context. But again, such are my feelings only when folks are glibly dismissive, arrogantly taking some subjective experience as more normative to them than established science. I don't think I need to defend the merit of such a stance to yourself. Again, if I appeared to have slighted any person, my apologies. I do try to play the ball, not the player - perhaps not always clearly so (yellow card?). </p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ampdog, post: 15550, member: 144"] :-[ :'( Again I seem not to have succeeded. [I]Certainly[/I] not all, Robert. Perhaps typical yes, as I hope will, in all fairness, have been apparent from my recent posts as well as those of others. (See reply to AV.) This is the penalty of labelling. An impression of class distinction is generated, which is in fact why it is regrettably successful as an promotional tool. Man's vanity etc. That you cannot deny. If you felt I did that to you (as in personally), I apologise. After all, I simply do not know you well enough to commit such a generality. I will accept that you fall into the category of AV's views, if that is what you say. I do recall using the phrase of "flat-earthers" - not sure in what context. But again, such are my feelings only when folks are glibly dismissive, arrogantly taking some subjective experience as more normative to them than established science. I don't think I need to defend the merit of such a stance to yourself. Again, if I appeared to have slighted any person, my apologies. I do try to play the ball, not the player - perhaps not always clearly so (yellow card?). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Means, Motive and Opportunity?
Top