If my remarks were read carefully, it would have been apparent that there is a difference between "disregarding observations because scientific reasons were not immediately apparent" and "disregarding observations because it is immediately apparent that science proves the opposite.
Hi Byrd2,
Sorry to quote from my own previous post, but I have now tried several times to "bring home" the above. Per your example of gravity; sure! We do not know a single thing about it - as we cannot explain the physics of electromagnetic waves!
But nobody has thus far tried/succeeded to prove the opposite or even suggested likewise! Is it so difficult to see this difference between my position and yours?

There is no evidence/logic/whatever to show that gravity/electromagnetic effects cannot exist. Its effect can be measured, and is repeatable. Therefore we do not need to know how it works (although I for one would like to!).
In contrast,
(1) There is every evidence/logic to show that demagnetising of CDs/records
cannot work.
(2) Its effect cannot be measured.
(3) It is not repeatable. In proper blind listening tests it has been demonstarted
every time that an effect cannot be detected with any statistic certainty.
Where else in science has anything been accepted when the opposite could be proven?
I repeat that I respect Joel's earlier tests. I also respect his stance of two posts ago and applaud that. But a few years ago I conducted a Bedini blind test (as well as I have been taught how). Five listeners were involved, there were 35 occasions on which to detect a difference. No difference were detected with statistical certainty. Many more reports in several magazines (e.g. Stereophile) support this. It has been done!
Does that mean that my tests were right and Joel's wrong? No. It simply means that the limitations of our measuring instrument (hearing) - as with all measuring instruments - should be taken into account.
How open-minded are we when all that is ignored? ("Open-minded" means to be open to possibilities, not to ignore proven certainties.)
But come on folks - am I the only scientist on this forum? I believe not!