Author Topic: Camera  (Read 2815 times)

...

  • Account Locked
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,450
Camera
« on: September 05, 2010, 09:12:37 pm »
Thanks to all who gave advice when I was looking for a DSLR.
I settled on the Canon EOS 450 D.
I have loads, but loads , sorry make that heaps to learn, but I took it for a play whilst being at lunch today, just some pics.
Far better than I achieved with compacts, but as I said LOADS to learn.










alternativeroute

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,877
  • :-)
    • South Africa Backpackers
Re: Camera
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2010, 09:22:06 pm »
 :o  :o  :o

Excellent... should tell that dude to crack a smile though

Family_Dog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,097
  • STEEL & GLASS - Everlasting Beauty!
Re: Camera
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2010, 09:22:54 pm »
Quote
Far better than I achieved with compacts, but as I said LOADS to learn.

You could have fooled me! Excellent pictures!  :D


-F_D



-Eric

That Guy in South Africa...
*************************************
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vintage_tube/
*************************************

Daniel Weston

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,145
Re: Camera
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2010, 09:52:36 am »
That looks life Safari World ;)

Viagara

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,921
  • Flying High, Digging Low
Re: Camera
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2010, 10:11:58 am »
Good pics!
Don't take life too seriously, you will not make it out alive.....

(Location Cape Town)
_________________________

...

  • Account Locked
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,450
Re: Camera
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 10:16:35 am »
That looks life Safari World ;)
X marks the spot  ;)
Thanks guys for the compliments, as I said, these cameras are super technical and I have loads to learn, these pics were taken with a Sigma 18-200 mm. lens (better than the kit lens as supplied), now to save up for a better lens  :o they cost a packet.
Looking at doing a course just to teach me all the basics, but it's loads of fun.

xrapidx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,124
Re: Camera
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 10:35:55 am »
Nice - I had the 450D :) I moved up to the 50D - which was a small adjustment, it was almost twice the size.

I also need to get a decent lens, I currently have:
Kit Lens (can't recall what it is)
Sigma 50-500mm - this thing is huge, I don't recommend it unless you really know you're going to use it a lot.
Canon 1.8 50mm - cheap prime lens that is great for low light conditions and bluring out the background.

Also - I got a battery grip off eBay with two batteries for R500 - it looks and feels identical to the Canon one, and the batteries are just as good, I easily get over a 1000 shots off them - I'll see if I can find the brand name.

Daniel Weston

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,145
Re: Camera
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2010, 10:40:14 am »
I got married there!
Ja, nice camera. My wife treated us for the WC and got us the 500D and we are loving it although we too need a course!!

Rodney_gold

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,613
Re: Camera
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2010, 11:09:22 am »
Great pics... good 1st effort
What I have found is that initially after going from a point and shoot to a DSLR , your pictures suffer a bit as the DSLR does not give as "pleasing" results as a P&S on auto does - you got to know a little more about F stops , shutter speeds etc etc.
Plenty online camera tutorials - the first thing to learn is the rule of thirds....

The 50-500 "bigma" lens is not a great lens as it has some "defects" , it is not image stabilised and goes to its 6.3 F stop quite early on in its zoom range (i think its at this at 125mm or less) - with a cropped camera , you need speeds of 1/800th of a sec at 500mm zoom (rule of thumb is that you need shutter speeds of 1 over focal length to combat camera shake), so in reality with this lens , you either need a tripod/monopoid and/or need to use iso's in the 800 range to get acceptable results. I had one of these lenses and sold it ... had issues focussing under lowish light conditions and the high ISO's produced some grain in the pics , also I had a polarising filter for this lens that was unuseable as it didnt allow Autofocus (it reduces the lens to like a F8 or worse as it stops light coming in) ...also had the 1.4x convertor , this too was useless as it didnt allow decent AF - it reduces the light by one stop - a lot of DSLR's wont focus properly with an effective F8 ... it's really a lens you can only use under ideal conditions.
I think you would do better with a 70-200 F4l and a 1.4x convertor if you really need more tele or the Sigma 80-400 stabilised lens..

The 2 lenses I suggest for cropped cameras in the Canon range (budget wise) are the 17-85 IS (can be had 2nd hand for R2500 or so) as a general walk around and then the 55-250 F4-5.6 IS as the telephoto lens (new around R3k , 2nd hand around 2k)
If you really like extreme Wide angle , the Canon 10-22 is a great lens...

« Last Edit: September 06, 2010, 11:12:03 am by Rodney_gold »
The nicest thing about smacking your head against the wall is......the feeling you get when you stop.

chris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 632
Re: Camera
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2010, 11:23:07 am »
Love your garden :o
.......................................

WaterDog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,488
Re: Camera
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2010, 01:41:38 pm »
Great pics... good 1st effort
What I have found is that initially after going from a point and shoot to a DSLR , your pictures suffer a bit as the DSLR does not give as "pleasing" results as a P&S on auto does - you got to know a little more about F stops , shutter speeds etc etc.


Also remember that to get best end results you have to "develop" your pictures using a "digital darkroom", i.e. tweak your pics a bit in a photo editing program - used the free Google program, Picasa to do this with your pics (title and bevel done in Photoshop. Tweaked colour, brightness, contrast and sharpness an recropped the pics for better framing.
Your pics look better than my first pics - good sense of composition already.









« Last Edit: September 06, 2010, 01:46:43 pm by waterhond »

frikkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,393
Re: Camera
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2010, 03:42:11 pm »
The liver is evil, and must be punished!

...

  • Account Locked
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,450
Re: Camera
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2010, 06:42:55 pm »

I think you would do better with a 70-200 F4l and a 1.4x convertor




Thanks for the advice, that is what I was looking at.
Thanks Waterhond, you have made my **** beautiful  :D

WaterDog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,488
Re: Camera
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2010, 06:52:21 pm »

Thanks Waterhond, you have made my **** beautiful  :D

Hahahaa!   I can honestly say that's the first time those words have been directed at me! ;D ;D

Ampdog

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: Camera
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2010, 10:55:13 pm »
Analogos,

From a camera club Beret worker, congratulations.  First get the technical things right; composition and character will come along with that. As said, enough books on the market to assist there - and if you yourself can join a camera club, lots of knowledge to be gained there. (I myself am stuck to 'old technology - Konika Autorex etc. - uneconomical to change now, and I am a transparency man.)

Enjoy - and watch it; this bug can bite hard and with addiction!
Judging a person does not define who he is; it only defines who you are. (Anon)