To be grumpy but correct,
Shouldn't ALL of this have been moved to the AVSA forum??
But seeing as how it is here, and until a Moderator moves it (I seem to be unable to

) -
Sabby,
Agreed - but do realise that every review also reflects only the reviewer's hearing, and you would probably not be ignorant how subjective hearing can be. Even in Stereophile (with likely a >10x readership and ad-support compared to AVSA) you might have noticed the (listening) reviewer giving rave reviews, while JA's measurements show distinct shortcomings, very audible distortion patterns etc. E.g. it is probably far enough into the past for this not going to implicate a certain product, but the reviewer stated at the end: "Boy, oh boy, can I ever recommend this amp!" - when JA's measurements showed a useless damping factor (about 1,2), varying frequency response, several % distortion, with such a row of high order harmonics that listener fatigue would have had no difficulty to assert itself. (Review of the same product in AVSA was quite more moderate.)
That said; yes, 'independent' assessment including measurements would be desirable, but they probably have neither the time nor the equipment. Do then read between the lines, but also take a review as guidance only. Ask yourself: Would we have been better off without AVSA? (and NO, I am not on their staff)
... and welcome here! Do pop in now and then.