^^^ It looks smoother because the T&S Specs in WinISD is incorrect. When I used that driver for the first time, I used a previous version of the specs from Seas (for the same driver) and it also suggested I use such a large enclosure. When I went and measured the T&S specs for the drivers I had, they were very different than what I got off the Seas website. Subsequently I noticed that Seas posted a newer version of the T&S specs that was closer to what I measured.
So, I can only assume that the T&S Data loaded on WinISD is incorrect. You are basing your design on this incorrect data, giving you results that doesn't make sense from the experience I (and others) have had with these.
To summarise:
- Get the new data from the Seas website
- Plug the new data into WinISD
- Do your simulations again
You'll find that your enclosure is going to be more in the region of 20L than 44L. You'll also find that the ideal tuning fro this driver will be in the 40-50Hz range. This is based on my own experience with that driver after I also made my boxes too big as I based my design on flaky data at the time.