After many years, I have read AVSA cover to cover, thanks to a Chris who shared his copies with me. There is a multitude of equipment out there and the choice is becoming ever more confusing.
I recommend that AVSA looks at incorporating the following into the reviews to better help one make a selection. This was in fact done many years ago, but has been abandoned. CAR Magazine reviews in this way, which I find informative.
For each review, have a list of Recommended Alternatives (Also See) within the price bracket. At least 3 alternatives to choose from, and what would be the Reviewers Choice.
Also, include a list of Likes and Dislikes for each kit that's reviewed.
I understand that AVSA cannot appear to slate one manufacturer for another as it's the support of the manufactures that keep the publication going. I still think that the reviews are too focused on the kit being reviewed - without sufficient reference to say another similar priced competition and how they stack up - more cross referencing required here.
Please look at this, as I do not think that CAR Magazine has lost industry support by adopting this method of review.IMO, CAR is one of the BEST magazines in the world with top notch reviews.
It's still a great magazine, however, I do miss the Letters section.
Santosh