CA/MS review Feb 2008 issue

[Ampdog]

No, the Commissioner of Police.
He seems to have done some distributing and dealing.....

[Andrew]

Hi Andrew

While I trust Joel in the way he goes about his review 100%, I have to wonder what the alterior motives were from the distributor.

IF HE WANTED A REVIEW OF THE 540, WHY NOT INSTALL AN BLOODY 540?? This part makes little sense. This makes me think of Alphabet's comments that there are some differences between a 540R and 640R amp.

I've never heard a CA 540R, and now I also don't have any reviewer reference, despite what is being said in the review.....

Lord, Alphabet, remind me to bliksem you next time I see you!  See what you've done... Devillears seems to understand it perfectly. There's honestly...really..no, I mean it... absolutely...completely...100%...beyond a shadow of a doubt...taking the oath and not the 5th Amendment...nothing that weird about this review. Deadlines + miscommunication = what happened here. Things like this happen more often than you realise.

[Viagara]

Lord, Alphabet, remind me to bliksem you next time I see you!  See what you've done... Devillears seems to understand it perfectly.

  My wooden spoon is still in tip top shape

I also understand, but could not resist the temptation Imagine working with me, even our IT Director gets the brunt when he deserves it

[Andrew]

My wooden spoon is still in tip top shape

I also understand, but could not resist the temptation Imagine working with me, even our IT Director gets the brunt when he deserves it

 

[RR]

I don't know what everyone is getting so excited about...

The "review request" came from the DISTRIBUTOR and specified the 540
The "review session" was hosted by a DEALER who had configured the 640

So what we have here is a breakdown in communication between DISTRIBUTOR and DEALER

So who can we blame? ESKOM of course!!!  Who else?

 

Hehe. OK, so it was a dealer mistake. Agree, it is not the end of the world.

[Viagara]

Hehe. OK, so it was a dealer mistake. Agree, it is not the end of the world.

But if you review a BMW 3 series and place a photo of a 1 series, is it still a valid review?

Okay Andrew I will stop now

[Andrew]

But if you review a BMW 3 series and place a photo of a 1 series, is it still a valid review?

Okay Andrew I will stop now

Come here so I can slap you. No, wait, I'll go slap Joel instead. Always makes me feel better.

[BigWoodenSpoon]

Like they say, when life gives you lemons, make lemonade. 

Naaaa ! Rather, drink tequila 

[RR]

Hehe. OK, so it was a dealer mistake. Agree, it is not the end of the world.

Still, we should slap the dealer.

Andrew, don't worry, I'm a BIG fan of the mag. I just don't like these type of balls ups.

[Viagara]

Andrew, don't worry, I'm a BIG fan of the mag. I just don't like these type of balls ups.

Same here and that is why I would raise such an issue

[Andrew]

Same here and that is why I would raise such an issue

Go slap Joel then, too. He's the one who did the review without bothering to tell me that a different model number had been substituted until I queried why the model number didn't match the one I was waiting for... 

[Viagara]

Go slap Joel then, too. He's the one who did the review without bothering to tell me that a different model number had been substituted until I queried why the model number didn't match the one I was waiting for... 

Passing the buck?

[Andrew]

Passing the buck?

Hell, no, just redirecting the blame where it really should go but rarely does... 

[joel]

Why slap me
All I did was go to where the system was set up and review it.

[RR]

Why slap me
All I did was go to where the system was set up and review it.

Exactly my point, and you had a deadline to consider. So I say again if any slapping needs to be done, lets bl..sem the dealer.

EDIT: OK, let me just put in a  before I'm sent for anger management by mod-Andrew